Striking the Balance between Nutrient Removal in Wastewater Treatment and Sustainability

WERF Report NUTR1R06n

Currency:

Standard price: £29.00

Available as an ebook

Please purchase via www.iwaponline.comOpens in new window

Also part of Water Intelligence Online Digital Reference Library

Standard ePrice: £29.00

+ VAT

Access ebook

Author(s): J.B. Neethling

Publication Date: 15/12/2011

Pages: 100

Binding: Paperback

ISBN13: 9781780400433

eISBN: 9781780403298

Download book flyer Print page

This study focuses on sustainability impacts as wastewater treatment plants implement treatment technologies to meet increasingly stringent nutrient limits. The objective is to determine if a point of “diminishing returns” is reached where the sustainability impacts of increased levels of nutrient removal outweigh the benefits of better water quality. Five different hypothetical treatment trains at a nominal 10 mgd flow were developed to meet treatment targets that ranged from cBOD mode (Level 1) to four different nutrient removal targets. The nutrient removal targets ranged from 8 mg N/L; 1 mg P/L (Level 2) to the most stringent at <2 mg N/L; <0.02 mg P/L (Level 5).

Given that sustainability is a broad term, the industry-accepted three pillars of sustainability were evaluated and discussed, and particular emphasis was placed on the environmental and economic pillars. The following variables received the most attention: greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, a water quality surrogate that reflects potential algal growth, capital and operational costs, energy demand, and consumables such as chemicals, gas, diesel, etc.

In terms of cost, the total project capital cost increases approximately one-third from $9.3 million to $12.7 million for changing from Level 1 to 2, followed by a more than doubling in cost when changing from Level 1 to 5. Total project capital costs in this report are for a Greenfield plant. The operational cost increase between levels is more pronounced than total project capital cost with more than five-times increase from Level 1 to 5 ($250/MG treated to $1,370/MG treated, respectively).

This report focused on in-plant (point source) options for nutrient removal and the implications for cost and sustainability. Other approaches, such as addressing non-point sources, could be added to the assessment. Rather than focusing strictly on point source dischargers and requiring Level 4 or 5 treatments, Level 3 or 4 treatments complimented with best management practices of non-point sources might be a more sustainable approach at achieving comparable water quality.

J.B. Neethling

The latest from @IWApublishing

RT : A toilet is not just a toilet. It’s a life-saver, dignity-protector and opportunity-maker. We must expand access… https://t.co/6zcGwSx3Kp 5 hours 10 min ago
As the Development Congress in Colombo, Sri Lanka approaches, we are sharing our free article collection of… https://t.co/HXwJKcmPzk 8 hours 43 min ago
RT : Check the THEME: Integrated Water Resources Management and REGISTER - https://t.co/JmPKTKtoex https://t.co/x1iyTi8VFs 10 hours 10 sec ago