WERF Report NUTR1R06b
Available as an ebook
Please purchase via www.iwaponline.comOpens in new window
Also part of Water Intelligence Online Digital Reference Library
Standard ePrice: £29.00
+ VAT
Available as an ebook
Please purchase via www.iwaponline.comOpens in new window
Also part of Water Intelligence Online Digital Reference Library
Standard ePrice: £29.00
+ VAT
Addition of external carbon to biological nutrient removal processes to enhance denitrification to meet more stringent effluent nitrogen limits (e.g., total nitrogen < 3 to 6 mg/L) has become more common for publicly owned treatment works. The objective of this report is to establish a framework for a comprehensive and practice-orientated standardized methodology and a procedure to assess the efficiency and feasibility of an alternative carbon source for enhancing nitrogen removal at full-scale wastewater treatment facilities.
The report includes a comprehensive literature review that summarizes various types of external carbon sources that can be applied for supporting denitrification. The summary included denitrification kinetics rates and coefficients. A road map is developed that depicts the overall framework and identifies the key components required for a comprehensive and systematic assessment of an alternative carbon source for denitrification.
A procedure for pre-screening carbon alternatives is established and an evaluation matrix is provided. The document presents a list of basic parameters that should be obtained or measured to determine the potential of a carbon source. These parameters are often available from the supplier. These basic parameters are used to determine the carbon-to-nitrogen demand ratio and process performance monitoring varies for field testing different nitrogen removal processes. Therefore, the guidance document first provides protocols for evaluating denitrification performance in a general anoxic denitrification reactor. Then, more configuration-specific examples are given for the most commonly used denitrification processes, including the modified Ludzack–Ettinger (MLE) process and 4-stage Bardenpho, either as a suspended-growth system or a fixed-film system.
The final selection of the external carbon source is based on a combination of literature review information, bench test parameters, and full-scale testing results.
Also available as part of your Water Inteligence Online subscription
This project evaluated the quality of data needed to determine relationships between chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) test results and in-stream biological condition. A data quality...
Polymer demand varies considerably for different digestion processes as well as the same digestion processes at different locations and the reasons for these differences are not known. The...
The expanding use of decentralized wastewater management has resulted in an increased interest in small-scale wetland treatment systems. However, there is limited information available on the use...
In recent years, concerns have been raised that low concentrations of chemicals may alter the normal functions of the endocrine system, resulting in potentially significant adverse effects on...
Ageing infrastructure and declining water resources are major concerns with a growing global population. Controlling water loss has therefore become a priority for water utilities around the world...
Approximately 35% of a wastewater treatment facilities’ total cost to provide wastewater service is for energy use. Industry wide, about 0.6% of the electric energy produced in the United States...
Approximately 23 percent of the estimated 115 million occupied homes in the United States are served by onsite wastewater systems. The vast majority of onsite wastewater treatment systems include...
Value engineering is a technique that wastewater treatment facilities (WWTFs) currently use, when required, to analyze cost reduction and performance optimization opportunities. The research...